static libraries' policy: possible solution

Tom 'spot' Callaway tcallawa at redhat.com
Tue Nov 15 21:07:07 UTC 2005


On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 17:49 +0300, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> What about the idea to ship static libraries the same way as debuginfo 
> is done?
> 
> On the one hand, no more static libs will be present in most of devel 
> packages. This should satisfy "no-static' guys, as no any static will be 
> on CD, DVD, most of mirrors etc. (the same way as there are no debuginfo 
> packages there).
> On the other hand, this can satisfy "save-static" guys, as there will be 
> possibility to download ready/correct static libraries for some rare 
> (but needed!) purposes.

I'm not opposed to this. Jeremy, what do you think?

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list