[Bug 173380] Review Request: nethack-vultures
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Nov 21 19:07:50 UTC 2005
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: nethack-vultures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173380
ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |ville.skytta at iki.fi
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-11-21 14:07 EST -------
Ok, thanks, the 0.2 release looks better.
Yep, you got the log2stderr stuff right, the intention of the stderr patch
I sent "upstream" to you was that in the future, the log2stderr patch in this
package could be later reduced to just #undef'ing (or removing the definition
of) JTP_LOG_FILE.
However, release 0.2 of the package adds the log2stderr patch back to the
source RPM, but forgets to apply it. Needs %patch3 in %prep.
Regarding the ncurses-devel dependency, I vaguely remember that it had
something to do with the -config patch enabling "#define LINUX", but I may
be wrong. Anyway, I agree that just having the build dependency in is ok for
now.
In case you're not aware of them, for finding missing build dependencies
you'll probably find the mock package and/or the fedora-rmdevelrpms script in
fedora-rpmdevtools useful.
So, this is approved, as long as the missing %patch3 line is put in before the
first build (you may do that after importing to CVS, while bumping the release
tag to 1%{?dist} ;)).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list