[Bug 172183] Review Request: drgeo-doc

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: drgeo-doc


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172183





------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr  2005-11-01 12:53 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> What the rationale for not packaging these files as part of the drgeo rsp.
> drgeo-devel packages?
> 
> To me, shipping them separately doesn't make much sense. 
It makes sense to package them separately because the soft and the doc does not
move at the same rate. That's why the version number for the soft is  
1.1.0 and 1.6 for doc. And that's why also the are shipped in 2 separate archives.
New version : 
Spec Name or Url: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.tanguy/drgeo-doc.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.tanguy/drgeo-doc-1.6-3.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.