rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/devel tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec,1.7,1.8

[Rex Dieter]

Paul Howarth wrote:

> I think the full command path should be used everywhere.

I disagree.  All I see is mostly specfile bloat.

Disadvantage of full path(s):
* What if a command ever gets moved to a different location (but is 
still in the default path)?

The only argument I've seen (so far) raised in favor of full paths:
*  Maliciously named programs in path.  If this is the case, end-user 
has bigger problems, IMO, outside the scope of rpm packaging 
guildelines.  Now, if the package in question is a security-related one, 
then, by all means, be paranoid and use full paths, just don't impose 
that "guideline" on everyone.