apcupsd- 3.10.18-3
Orion Poplawski
orion at cora.nwra.com
Wed Nov 2 19:18:00 UTC 2005
CCing extras-list to make public. Perhaps bugzilla would have been the
appropriate place.
Luboš Staněk wrote:
> Hi Orion,
> I am using apcupsd on my machines due to poor USB handling by nut.
>
> I have reviewed your changes to the extras package and I consider them
> insufficient.
>
> Problems:
>
> 1) init script:
> - Reload action: do you think that reload and restart are the same? I do
> not! I think that the reload means that the application can handle
> config reloading after a signal (frequently SIGHUP) without breaking
> current status. Consider that master reloads itself your way but all
> slaves may loose connections.
> - Autostarting the daemon without proper configuration is meaningless if
> you do not provide autoconfiguration mechanism.
Other services that don't handle SIGHUP like methods have reload mapped
to resart (e.g. dhcp). I guess the question is what is worse - having
"service apcupsd reload" not do *anything*, or have it do a restart.
Service is not started automatically.
> 2) SMP: I am working on AMD Athlon 64 X2 machine and the -j2 build works
> fine.
>
-j 3 broke on at least one machine so it's gone. Besides, that's just a
small build time issue.
> 3) Your package does not build and distribute the USB driver.
>
Not sure I follow. I have no trouble talking with USB UPSes. hid-ups
is just a test program, not a driver.
> 4) Patching and modifying runtime initscripts without reapplying changes
> after their update is not good. Either ask initscripts maintainers to
> add apcupsd handling in the halt script or use other solution.
>
Where is this being done?
--
Orion Poplawski
System Administrator 303-415-9701 x222
Colorado Research Associates/NWRA FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane, Boulder CO 80301 http://www.co-ra.com
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list