Sugg: Improve for mock (caching)

seth vidal skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Thu Nov 3 20:20:30 UTC 2005


On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 21:18 +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 15:02:44 -0500, you wrote:
> 
> >If its not then we need to start checking out where the bottlenecks are.
> >If the ONLY thing that's making the chroot builds go slowly is the
> >network performance - meaning if we removed that problem everything
> >would be amazingly fast then we'd be better off not caching but having a
> >local mirror on the builder nodes.
> >
> >But I don't think the network is the only bottleneck. I think there are
> >places in the installation mechanism where we can get some speedups.
> >Let's look at those instead?
> 
> Thank you for your comments. I can accept, that you have a other
> point of view, becouse you have a better network connectiviity
> then I have.
> 
> I think, yum may be a bottleleg too. From my feeling, yum needs
> equeal or more time to process metadata then the final rpm run.
> 

You are using yum 2.4.X, right?

-sv





More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list