[Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mpich2 -  An implementation of MPI


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993





------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com  2005-11-04 13:41 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)

> you should either add an
> 
> | %exclude %_libdir/debug

Thanks, I've done this and also not package the binary examples.

> 
> When mpich2 ships libraries which can be used by applications, the package
> should be splitted into a main and a -devel subpackage. Or, at least you should
> 'Provide: %name-devel = %version-%release'

I've taken a look at lam (in fedora core), and it doesn't provide a -devel
subpackage too. The two (mpich and lam) are alternative implementation of MPI
protocol and are very similar both in use and in packaging. 
I really don't know how the split into a -devel subpackage should be done (if at
all necessary), i mean which files should remain in the package and what goes
into the -devel subpackage.

Spec Name or Url: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.2p1-3.src.rpm
SRPM Name or Url: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.