[Bug 172331] Review Request: perl-XML-DOM
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Nov 5 08:13:47 UTC 2005
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-DOM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172331
rc040203 at freenet.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |rc040203 at freenet.de
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-11-05 03:13 EST -------
APPROVED
As with XML-RegExp, tested on FC4 only, but ... can't spot anything justifying
to withhold this package.
One remark:
I think, I understand why this package "Obsoletes: perl-libxml-enno <= 1.02",
but is this Obsoletes really necessary?
FC4's perl-libxml-enno provides perl(XML::DOM) = 1.27, while this package
provides perl(XML::DOM) = 1.44. Unless I'm mistaken, as perl-libxml-enno will
continue to exist in FC5, when releasing a perl-libxml-enno package w/o XML-DOM
removed simultaneously with this perl-XML-DOM package should suffice.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list