[Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Nov 11 18:01:17 UTC 2005
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347
dmitry at butskoy.name changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |dmitry at butskoy.name
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-11-11 13:01 EST -------
> rp-l2tp development has stalled.
Well, foo on it :)
> l2tp development in cvs has started again, and some of the long standing
> patches that are in Jacco's rpm have been integrated. I am waiting for a real
> release before updating my rpm.
May be it is better to use CVS tarball instead of the old version with a lot of
patches? Especially if a real release will be coming soon.
> In the next few days I will be updating the l2tp rpm to include the patent
> documentation.
I could not find the license text in Internet (only patent itself is present
without any license info). But now I am sure that there are no any license
issues, therefore just write some own text from the scratch and include it as
another README file.
Some remark before I'll review it: is "Requires: openswan" actually needed? Is
it possible to use l2tpd without IPSec?
In the nearest future (next week) I am going to make a VPN gate for my local
network, and just this package is required to me. Therefore I can check up all
in work, which is good for any review. :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list