static libraries' policy

[Neal Becker]

Dmitry Butskoy wrote:

> Christian.Iseli at licr.org wrote:
> 
>>buc at odusz.so-cdu.ru said:
>>  
>>
>>>This situation creates a precedent: there is a policy, but significant 
>>>part
>>>of maintainers ignore it. Is it allowed (i.e. some kind of  liberalism in
>>>Fedora) or is it bad (makes an anarchy)?
>>>    
>>>
>>
>>Hmm, maybe you just need a bit more patience ? :-)
>>  
>>
> Sure! :-)
> I have been confused by very different attitude of different reviewers
> to the static libs' policy...
> 
>>The noun "moment of inertia" has one meaning:
>>Meaning #1: the tendency of a body to resist angular acceleration
>>  

Q: What do you think about large rotating bodies?
A: They have their moments.