x86_64 arch

[Eric Tanguy]

Le mercredi 16 novembre 2005 à 07:12 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis a écrit :
> Am Dienstag, den 15.11.2005, 21:33 -0800 schrieb Michael A. Peters:
> > On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 21:31 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > Eric Tanguy wrote:
> > > > I have a package (ircd-hybrid) which make errors compiling on x86_64 (at
> > > > least). I put the information upstream but i still have no answer could
> > > > i add ExcludeArch: x86_64 to go ahead ?
> > > 
> > > IMO, that's acceptable.
> 
> It is acceptable if you at least tried to fix it or asked for help on
> this list if you have no access to x64 -- if no one steps up to help go
> ahead.
> 
> > You can do that, but file a bug report - and not the bug # in a comment
> > under the exclude arch.
> 
> That is required. See:
> http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewGuidelines
> 
> Quoting:
> 
> MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
> architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
> ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug
> filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not
> compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be
> placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New
> packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so
> they should put this description in the comment until the package is
> approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation
> with the bug number.
> 
> CU
> thl
> 
Thanks, so the build log is
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/960-ircd-hybrid-7.1.3-7.fc5/x86_64/build.log
if someone could see what is the problem and how to solve it because i
still have no answer from upstream.
Eric