[Bug 173368] New: Review Request: planetplanet

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Nov 16 17:25:46 UTC 2005


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173368

           Summary: Review Request: planetplanet
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
               URL: http://www.planetplanet.org/
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: rich at phekda.gotadsl.co.uk
         QAContact: dkl at redhat.com
                CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com


Spec Name or Url: http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~phekda/richdawe/fedora/FC4/planetplanet.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~phekda/richdawe/fedora/FC4/planetplanet-1.0-0.1.20051115arch.src.rpm
Description:

>From Planet's README:

"Planet is a flexible feed aggregator, this means that it downloads feeds and aggregates their content together into a single combined feed with the latest news first.

It uses Mark Pilgrim's Ultra-liberal feed parser so can read from RDF, RSS and Atom feeds and Tomas Styblo's template library to output static files in unlimited formats based on a series of templates."

It's built from a snapshot taken from the GNU arch repository yesterday. Note that the planetplanet.org page lists the wrong branch (or whatever arch calls them). It should be:

jdub at perkypants.org--projects/planet--devel--1.0

I've called the package "planetplanet" to match the executable name "planetplanet". The program from upstream is actually called planet.py, but I had problems with planet.py not being able to find the "planet" module that went away when I renamed the script (see <http://lists.planetplanet.org/pipermail/devel/2005-November/000714.html>). I chose planetplanet to match the website.

There are some rpmlint warnings & errors (see below), but I believe they're spurious. In particular, the errors on .py seem quite selective - rpmlint doesn't warn about the other .py files in the same directory. "Python license" was copied from the list of licences in the rpmlint Python code itself!

[rpmbuild at katrina noarch]$ rpmlint planetplanet-1.0-0.1.20051115arch.noarch.rpm W: planetplanet invalid-license Python license
E: planetplanet non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/planet/__init__.py 0644
E: planetplanet non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/planet/feedparser.py 0644
E: planetplanet non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/planet/cache.py 0644

If you want to give planetplanet a whirl, I can give you an example config. Just let me know.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list