[Bug 173790] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fcextras

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fcextras


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173790





------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name  2005-11-21 06:58 EST -------
May be better to name it "gstreamer-plugins-extras", not "...-fcextras"?

There are some precedents (gnome-themes-extras in FE, php-extras under review).
Additionally, as %{?dist} is present and will be substituted like "fcX", there
is no need to mark again that it is FC-related package...

"-audio/-video" -- Is such a separation useful enough? I understand reasons for
this, but IMHO it would be a little more easy for users to have
"gstreamers-plugins-extras" accompanied with "gstreamers-plugins-livna" (;)),
and nothing more.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.