static libraries' policy

[Dmitry Butskoy]

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:

>>Extras: 149/235 -- 63% have static libs
>>Core: 211/364 -- 58% have static libs
>>    
>>
>
>Names please. Then we can go about fixing this.
>
>  
>
...
Jeff Spaleta wrote:

>>  Sure! Attached.
>
>I'd like to know exactly how you compiled that list. 
>
>>  The idea is to check whether the "%files devel" section has some ".a"
>> files.
>
>Thanks. I just like full disclosure as to how lists are generated.
>
>  
>
The list is already generated some time ago. What's further?

May be contact the appropriate packages' maintainers to ask, why they 
use static libraries despite of the recommendation to avoid it...


~buc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20051121/a78480ab/attachment.htm>