[Bug 174266] Review Request: GNOME Structured File library 1.13

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: GNOME Structured File library 1.13


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174266





------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2005-11-28 02:34 EST -------
In reply to comment #1:
-The .mo file is also removed in the core spec file, which I used as a base
 dunno why.
-.la files are evil and should be removed, this is actually in the review 
 guidelines.
-The gsf-office-thumbnailer files are removed because this is an application not 
 needed for building against the lib, it could be left in but users still would
 get the old verison by default since that is in /usr/bin, i basicly see no
 use for this.
-The .a file is removed because I see no use for a static library of this 
 specific (newer then default) version, also there is a general discussion
 if static libs should be shipped at all.
All this files could be left in without a conflict since they are all under
%{libgsfdir}. Should I add the above "items" as comments to the .spec?

Comment #2:
I'll fix the %config and URL tag

Comment #3:
Correct

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.