[Bug 168190] Review Request: gpsim - A simulator for Microchip (TM) PIC (TM) microcontrollers

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gpsim - A simulator for Microchip (TM) PIC (TM) microcontrollers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168190





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2005-10-05 03:59 EST -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> To name these packages, I purpose gtk+extra for the 1.0.0 version and 
> gtk2+extra for the 2.1.1 version. 
OK with me.
  
> What to do with the current package named gtk+extra-1.1.0 on the cvs? 
> Because it will seems newer than gtk+extra-1.0.0. 
I see 3 approaches:

1. package the official gtk+extra-1.x into gtk+extra and increment this
package's epoch. This way, the new gtk+extra package will drive the "inofficial
version" out of systems.

2. Ask one of the release managers to remove the already released *rpms.
Unfortunately I don't know who is able to do so.

3. Do nothing, and let gtk+extra-1.1 die out (discontinue the package). 
As it already had been released for devel, this would imply the package would
vanish for FC6 (!). However if another package should require gtk+extra-1.x you
probably will have to switch to item 1. above.

To me, 1. seems to be the cleanest solution.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.