libGL* dependencies
Ralf Corsepius
rc040203 at freenet.de
Mon Oct 17 17:20:22 UTC 2005
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 12:00 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 19:34 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> >
> >>On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 11:55 -0400, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>* Mon Oct 17 2005 Rex Dieter <rexdieter[AT]users.sf.net> 1.0.90-2
> >>>- BR: libGL.so.1 -> BR: %x_pkg-Mesa-libGL
> >>
> >>I believe the preferred way to do that stuff nowadays (FC3+) is using
> >>libGL/libGLU/libGL-devel/libGLU-devel as appropriate.
> >>
> >>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2005-March/msg00128.html
> >
> >
> > This proposal is a dead born child:
> > updates/4/i386/xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.8.2-37.FC4.49.2.i386.rpm
> > updates/4/x86_64/xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.8.2-37.FC4.49.2.x86_64.rpm
> > Note: Both packages "Provide: libGL = 1"
>
> I see
> Requires: libGL = 1
> as replacing
> Requires: libGL.so.1
> so that it works as advertised. What was the point you were trying to make?
Try on a x86_64 system with both i386 and x86_64 repositories
installed.
Question of the day: Which package will yum/mock pull in?
Ralf
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list