libGL* dependencies (was: Re: rpms/xforms/devel xforms.spec,1.9,1.10)

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

Am Montag, den 17.10.2005, 18:50 +0200 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
> On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 19:34 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 11:55 -0400, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > 
> > > * Mon Oct 17 2005 Rex Dieter <rexdieter[AT]users.sf.net> 1.0.90-2
> > > - BR: libGL.so.1 -> BR: %x_pkg-Mesa-libGL 
> > 
> > I believe the preferred way to do that stuff nowadays (FC3+) is using
> > libGL/libGLU/libGL-devel/libGLU-devel as appropriate.
> > 
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2005-March/msg00128.html
> 
> This proposal is a dead born child:
[...]
> Note: Both packages "Provide: libGL = 1"

And where exactly do you see this as a problem? Just an example from my
x86_64 Box:

$ yum resolvedep "libGL = 1"
Searching Packages for Dependency:
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
0:xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.8.2-37.FC4.49.2.x86_64

$ yum list all xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL*
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Installed Packages
xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL.x86_64               6.8.2-37.FC4.49.2      installed
xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL.i386                 6.8.2-37.FC4.49.2      installed
xorg-x11-Mesa-libGLU.x86_64              6.8.2-37.FC4.49.2      installed
xorg-x11-Mesa-libGLU.x86_64              6.8.2-37.FC4.48.1      installed
Available Packages
xorg-x11-Mesa-libGLU.i386                6.8.2-37.FC4.49.2      updates-released

So I think the buildsystem should do the right thing. 
-- 
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info>