A lot of obsolete rpms in FE currently
Greg DeKoenigsberg
gdk at redhat.com
Tue Oct 18 15:49:11 UTC 2005
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> Because of the "rolling" nature of the Extras tree.. i feel its
> vital..that at least one older version of packages are in the tree for
> a period of time after an update is pushed in case an updated package
> has a showstopping problem.. so users can fallback to something while
> any such problem is worked out and fixed.
s/at least one/exactly one?
Would this constitute a sensible policy?
--g
_____________________ ____________________________________________
Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent. the
Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the
] [ dumb. --mcluhan
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list