[Bug 171597] Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171597





------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us  2005-10-24 16:39 EST -------
New spec/srpms:

Spec Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/spandsp-0.0.3-0.2.pre4.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/spandsp-0.0.3-0.2.pre4.src.rpm

As far as the DueDilligence file, I've asked in a number of places about the
implications of including SpanDSP in FE before and gotten generally positive
responses.  I have not specifically gotten any opinions from RedHat Legal.  What
is the process for requesting an opinion from Fedora Legal?  Nothing obvious
turned up in a Google search or the Fedora wiki.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.