[Bug 168190] Review Request: gpsim - A simulator for Microchip (TM) PIC (TM) microcontrollers

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gpsim - A simulator for Microchip (TM) PIC (TM) microcontrollers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168190





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2005-10-03 05:34 EST -------
> So he provide a release he need (gtk+extra 1.1.0). 

There has been an official 1.0.0 release. How does the 1.1.0 unofficial
release compare with the official 1.0.0? What exactly is this 1.1.0
version? Where does it come from? Who is the one who came up with
that version number? Is it a CVS snapshot? Did the gpsim maintainer
create this version number out of thin air?

WRT Ralf's points: Full ACK.

We cannot offer an unofficial release with an unofficial version number
unless it is assured that the official release, regardless of how old it
may be, can be shipped conflict-free and using its original version and
official package name.

In addition to the explicit versioned Requires being both too strict
and too fragile, does the package provide any SONAMES which would
conflict with the official gtk+extra versions?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.