[Bug 168190] Review Request: gpsim - A simulator for Microchip (TM) PIC (TM) microcontrollers

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gpsim - A simulator for Microchip (TM) PIC (TM) microcontrollers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168190





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2005-10-05 06:36 EST -------
Different option:

Put gtk+extra 2.x into package name "gtk+extra" version 2.x, which will
upgrade the existing packages for the unofficial 1.1.0 version.

Is gtk+extra 1.x needed by anything? Or would it be packaged just for
fun/completeness? If so, it could be packaged as gtk+extra1 any time.
Just make sure that it doesn't conflict _if_ it were packaged.

> Should I have to do the same thing with the gpsim spec
> because 0.21.4 requires the inofficial gtk+extra package? 

No. You would build the new gpsim version against your latest
gtk+extra packages, and it would be seen as an upgrade. Mind you,
dependencies on the new/different gtk+extra SONAMES are automatic.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.