[Bug 168190] Review Request: gpsim - A simulator for Microchip (TM) PIC (TM) microcontrollers

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gpsim - A simulator for Microchip (TM) PIC (TM) microcontrollers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168190





------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr  2005-10-05 07:32 EST -------
(In reply to comment #16) 
> Different option: 
>  
> Put gtk+extra 2.x into package name "gtk+extra" version 2.x, which will 
> upgrade the existing packages for the unofficial 1.1.0 version. 
>  
> Is gtk+extra 1.x needed by anything? 
 
Not in Fedora at the moment, since that's me that want to introduce it because 
it was needed by gpsim (for previous releases). 
 
> Or would it be packaged just for 
> fun/completeness? 
 
I just listened Ralf. 
 
> If so, it could be packaged as gtk+extra1 any time. 
> Just make sure that it doesn't conflict _if_ it were packaged. 
 
No conflict. Both are currently installed on my box. 
 
> > Should I have to do the same thing with the gpsim spec 
> > because 0.21.4 requires the inofficial gtk+extra package?  
>  
> No. You would build the new gpsim version against your latest 
> gtk+extra packages, and it would be seen as an upgrade. Mind you, 
> dependencies on the new/different gtk+extra SONAMES are automatic. 
 
OK. 
 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.