[Bug 169735] Review Request: tetex-fontools - Tools to simplify using fonts.

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tetex-fontools - Tools to simplify using fonts.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169735


mpeters at mac.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jpo at di.uminho.pt




------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com  2005-10-07 08:19 EST -------
http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/tetex-fontools-1.0-3.9.src.rpm
http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/tetex-fontools.spec

tetex-fonts dependency removed
zip file redownloaded with wget -N

-=-
With respect to the tex doc dir, the reason I do it that way is because if the
%{texpkgdoc} macro is used and the user does not have tetex-doc package
installed, then uninstall is not clean because it leaves the latex directory
unowned by anything.

My first tetex package - tetex-prosper - I did it the way suggested but was
instructed to either
a) require tetex-doc (a huge package many users don't want)
b) change it to %{_texmf}/doc/ so that it would uninstall cleanly if no other
package was installed that owned /usr/share/texmf/doc/latex

Another extras package by a packaging veteran that does it same way:
tetex-perltex (maintained by Jose Pedro Oliveira)

I've put him on the cc list

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.