libGL* dependencies (was: Re: rpms/xforms/devel xforms.spec,1.9,1.10)

[Ville Skyttä]

On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 08:25 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 18.10.2005, 09:05 +0300 schrieb Ville Skyttä:
> > On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 07:33 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, den 18.10.2005, 06:43 +0200 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
> > > > 
> > > > For the moment, I'll stay with real package dependencies, such as
> > > > "BR: xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL" for my GL based packages in FE.
> > > 
> > > And IMHO that is the right decision.
> > 
> > But it won't be any different from the libGL approach regarding the
> > x86_64 case where both x86_64 and i386 repositories are enabled,
> > right?
> 
> /me is not sure if he understood the question correctly. Sorry.
> 
> So just to be sure: I assume by "where both x86_64 and i386 repositories
> are enabled" you meant "where i386 packages from the x86_64-repositories
> are not excluded in the yum or mock config" (as they are in the buildsys
> afaik). And with the "libGL approach" you mean "BR: libgl = 1". 

I don't know what I mean ;), just parroting Ralf's earlier "random
accident" concern, and I'll shut up now to prevent further confusion.
But it's probably the above, and from what I understand (not having an
x86_64 box around nor any that would use any 3rd party libGL* stuff),
"BR: xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL" sounds like the safest approach indeed for
now.