[Bug 171443] Provides need to be inserted in spec file

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Provides need to be inserted in spec file


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171443


mej at eterm.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mej at eterm.org




------- Additional Comments From mej at eterm.org  2005-10-24 15:47 EST -------
Warren:  No, the upstream RPM is not "wrong."  RPM autoreq resolution will not
pick up the required loaders because they are dynamically loaded at runtime when
trying to load a JPEG or PNG image.  The default theme uses both these formats
and thus requires those two loaders be present.

Rex:  Authoritative upstream packages for Imlib2 can be found at
http://enlightenment.freedesktop.org/ (tarballs containing spec files) and
http://mirror.caosity.org/cAos-2/ext/autobuilder/i386/00_LOGS/e/imlib2/ (source
and binary RPM's).  Your suggestion to require the specific .so files is
incorrect: it fails to account for multi-arch and /usr/lib64.

The sad part of all this is that it would've taken far less time to simply add
the Provides: lines suggested to the spec file than to carry on this discussion.
 You even had them provided for you to cut-and-paste!  So why not do that
instead of playing the Fedora-is-right-and-everyone-else-is-wrong game?  :-)


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.