rpms/grhino/devel grhino-Makefile-in.patch, NONE, 1.1 grhino.desktop, NONE, 1.1 grhino.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

Tom 'spot' Callaway tcallawa at redhat.com
Sun Sep 4 21:08:34 UTC 2005

On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 12:27 -0500, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:

> Done. The idea is that the binaries shipped would be free of trademark
> infringements, right? If the source cannot contain any mention of
> Othello then instead of patching during rebuilding I'd have to package a
> modified tarball.

You'll probably need to do that. Just pretend that instead of Red Hat
getting sued for trademark infringement, you'd be sued, and act
accordingly. :)

Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!

More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list