[Bug 168012] Review Request: kawa

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Sep 11 12:11:35 UTC 2005

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kawa


------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch  2005-09-11 08:11 EST -------
I am quite experienced with traditional java, but the fedora java setup
leaves me a little stunned :-(
Ok, what I found out is that you don't compile with gcj, but use a "simulated"
traditional jdk setup, i.e. compile java byte code with ecj and interpret it
with gij. Is this correct? Then you take the additional step to gcj-compile
the whole .jar and put it in the gcj database.
The other way is to compile the .java files individually and link to a native
binary (this is what --with-gcj) does.
Are both ways equivalent in that a native version is executed, in the one
case an executable in the other case a shared library? Can one prefer
one over the other?

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list