FrobTADS Licensing

[Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams]

On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 13:53 -0700, Chris Grau wrote:
> After some discussion in the Bugzilla review request[1] and in
> #fedora-extras, it was recommended that I contact the list for advice.
> 
> The licensing for FrobTADS derives from the licensing for TADS v2[2] and
> TADS v3[3].  These are obviously neither OSI- nor FSF-approved licenses.
> The author has no intention of changing the license, so what I want to
> know is whether or not this package can be included in Extras.  I
> suspect not, in which case I can look into contributing it to Livna.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167563
> [2] http://www.chrisgrau.com/packages/frobtads/LICENSE-TADS2.TXT
> [3] http://www.chrisgrau.com/packages/frobtads/LICENSE-TADS3.TXT

Lovely. Yet another person that subscribes to UW's policy of Thinking
Small.

-1

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050913/2fa21e20/attachment.sig>