[Bug 166063] Review Request: perl-HTML-Mason

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Sep 16 02:45:52 UTC 2005

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Mason


------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2005-09-15 22:45 EST -------
(In reply to comment #24)
> (In reply to comment #23)
> > I am still having doubts on /var/www/mason and therefore don't want to approve
> > the package (Did anybody consider the FHS?).
> I think if we were to follow the FHS, the entire www tree would be moved to
> /srv.  However, I'm sure that's a flame war that's been faught elsewhere.
Yes, but you are aware, that the move to /srv already is taking place, even on
RH based distributions?

> The /var/www/mason directory is not without precedent.  Consider, for example,
> /var/www/{cgi-bin,error,icons,manual} owned by httpd and httpd-manual.  Also
> /var/www/usage owned by webalizer. 

> I don't know how others go about this, but my use of /var/www/mason is as a
> private component root so that components/pages in the document root can call
> them, but they are not accessible through a public URL.
Let me ask differently: Can /var/www/mason be read-only?

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list