[Bug 167376] Review Request: perl-DateTime

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Sep 16 13:37:02 UTC 2005

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime


paul at city-fan.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com              |paul at city-fan.org
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |

------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2005-09-16 09:36 EST -------
Well, this was an interesting package. Looking at it, I found a few problems and
nit-picks without doing a formal review:

- The DateTime tarball was unpacked three times, once when expected and also
when the other two tarballs were unpacked

- The files list listed some files more than once (since the package contains a
mix of arch-specific and arch-independent modules, and %{perl_vendorarch} is
included within %{perl_vendorlib})

- The DT::Locale module includes an additional license file

- The package wasn't rpmlint clean (complains about having both versioned and
unversioned Provides: entries for two of the modules)

- The package doesn't build in mock (PERLLIB gets clobbered by the test scripts)

I've had a go at fixing all of these issues, and will attach a new spec file to
this bug. See what you think.

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list