[Bug 167376] Review Request: perl-DateTime
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Sep 16 13:37:02 UTC 2005
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167376
paul at city-fan.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |paul at city-fan.org
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-09-16 09:36 EST -------
Well, this was an interesting package. Looking at it, I found a few problems and
nit-picks without doing a formal review:
- The DateTime tarball was unpacked three times, once when expected and also
when the other two tarballs were unpacked
- The files list listed some files more than once (since the package contains a
mix of arch-specific and arch-independent modules, and %{perl_vendorarch} is
included within %{perl_vendorlib})
- The DT::Locale module includes an additional license file
- The package wasn't rpmlint clean (complains about having both versioned and
unversioned Provides: entries for two of the modules)
- The package doesn't build in mock (PERLLIB gets clobbered by the test scripts)
I've had a go at fixing all of these issues, and will attach a new spec file to
this bug. See what you think.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list