[Bug 167482] Review Request: jogl

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jogl


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167482


green at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER           |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |fitzsim at redhat.com




------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com  2005-09-03 16:53 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> You can remove the "Epoch: 0" from FC3+ packages, and also the "0:" in the
> versioned dependency.  Epoch in versioned dependencies are needed in cases
> however where the epoch is greater than zero.

Ok.  I was just following the practice established in all of the FC java packges.

> %ghost %doc %{_javadocdir}/%{name}
> What is the purpose of this?  This looks extremely odd.

To be honest, I'm not sure.  It's just established practice for FC java packages.
 
> I didn't test a build yet and I don't know java packaging too well, so hopefully
> we can get more input from someone else.

I'll add fitzsim to CC.  I hope he doesn't mind :-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.