[Bug 166189] Review Request: perl-Class-DBI-Loader-Relationship : Easier relationship specification in CDBI::L

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-DBI-Loader-Relationship : Easier relationship specification in CDBI::L


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166189


paul at city-fan.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com              |paul at city-fan.org
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2005-09-12 06:09 EST -------
Review:

- rpmlint clean
- package and spec naming OK
- package meets guidelines
- spec file written in English and is legible
- sources match upstream
- package builds OK in mock for FC4 (i396)
- BR's OK
- no locales, libraries, subpackages or pkgconfigs to worry about
- not relocatable
- no duplicate files
- no directory ownership or permissions issues
- %clean section present and correct
- macro usage is consistent
- no large docs
- docs don't affect runtime
- no scriptlets
- no .desktop file needed
- code, not content

Needswork:

- I can't find any trace of licensing terms for this package. Where did you
  find the "same terms as perl" license info?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.