[Bug 166800] Review Request: sbcl: The Steel Bank Common Lisp development environment

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sbcl: The Steel Bank Common Lisp development environment


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166800





------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch  2005-09-13 17:30 EST -------
(In reply to comment #29)
> Gérard, the latest ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE patch sbcl is building with atm is using
> argv[0] instead of relying upon /proc/self/exe.  Do you see anything
> wrong/dangerous in this approach?
GCL uses the same approach, so it's probably ok. I hope that memory management
for these LISP compilers while sometime adapted to work without this hack,
but I am sceptical.
Try to build maxima with GCL and SBCL. If the hack doesn't cause any problems
it seems good enough.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.