[Bug 168339] Review Request: libbinio

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Sep 27 13:09:26 UTC 2005


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libbinio


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168339





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2005-09-27 09:09 EST -------
(In reply to comment #19)
> Would someone like to FE-ACCEPT (Approve) this package now?
First of all, you can't push me or any body else around here - Most of us are 
volunteers and probably only very few are being paid, so .. patience please ;)

Anyway, further comments:

There still are blocking issues:

1. the /usr/share/info/dir entry being produced by the *.texi is broken. 
(Try "info libbinio" and try to enter the libbinio node).

A fix to the sources would be this patch and to regenerate the info files:

diff -ur libbinio-1.4.orig/doc/libbinio.texi libbinio-1.4/doc/libbinio.texi
--- libbinio-1.4.orig/doc/libbinio.texi 2004-08-18 21:49:11.000000000 +0200
+++ libbinio-1.4/doc/libbinio.texi      2005-09-27 14:43:23.000000000 +0200
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@

 @dircategory Software Libraries
 @direntry
-* libbinio: (libbinio)          Binary I/O stream class library @value{VERSION}
+* libbinio: (libbinio).         Binary I/O stream class library @value{VERSION}
 @end direntry

 @titlepage

2. The info files are developer docs, so they should better be packaged into the
*-devel package.

3. The pkgconfig file is non-functional:
# pkg-config --libs libbinio
Unknown keyword 'URL' in '/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libbinio.pc'


Non blocking issues:

* IMO, this is questionable design:
# pkg-config --cflags libbinio
-I/usr/include/libbinio

Is this really what upstream wants?

* Has this code been tested on big endian targets?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list