[Bug 187697] Review Request: zasx - Asteroid like game with powerups

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Apr 3 02:50:58 UTC 2006

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: zasx - Asteroid like game with powerups


------- Additional Comments From tkmame at retrogames.com  2006-04-02 22:50 EST -------
- rpmlint output:
W: zasx invalid-license GPL and freely distributable content
W: zasx invalid-license GPL and freely distributable content
W: zasx-debuginfo invalid-license GPL and freely distributable content

readme.txt says sound effects are under Giftware license which is what allegro
uses so I guess that is permissable.  Other license restrictions mentioned are met.


-package naming guidelines OKAY
-specfile name matches base package name OKAY
-package meets guidelines OKAY
-package license OKAY (see above)
-License field matches license 

Perhaps you should mention Giftware license in License tag

-license text included in %doc OKAY
-spec file in english OKAY
-spec file legible OKAY
-md5sums match
8706050ad5e54b673c2e2a987c581d67  zasx130s.zip
-successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC5 OKAY
-package contains no unnecessary BR OKAY
-all build dependencies are met in BR OKAY
-no locales OKAY
-package does not conain libraries OKAY
-package is not relocatable OKAY
-package does not create directories OKAY
-package does not conatin duplicate files OKAY
-permissions on files set correctly OKAY
-%clean removes buildroot OKAY
-spec file has consistant use of macros OKAY
-package contains permissible content OKAY
-package documentation is not large enough to warrent a -docs package OKAY
-files in %doc do not affect runtime OKAY
-package does not contain anything that should go in -devel OKAY
-package includes .desktop entry which meet guidelines OKAY
-package does not own files or directories owned by other packages OKAY

Everything looks good, except perhaps you should mention Giftware in the License

I'd assign myself to this bug and move it to FE-REVIEW, but I still can't do
that. :(

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list