gsview's AFPL licensing
kevin.kofler at chello.at
Wed Apr 5 19:23:33 UTC 2006
> > I also don't see why GSView is needed in Extras at all, given that:
> > * there are alternatives (with less restrictive licensing)...
> > * it uses the obsolete GTK+ 1.2,
> > * repoquery --whatrequires gsview returns nothing....
> This bit is irrelavent. These additional criteria are not required for
> including something in Extras.
True, Extras does not have a policy against unneeded obsolete software. ;-) It
does have a policy against non-Free software though.
More information about the fedora-extras-list