[Bug 177276] Review Request: perl-DBD-AnyData : DBI access to XML, CSV and other formats

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Apr 7 19:38:06 UTC 2006

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-AnyData : DBI access to XML, CSV and other formats


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |

------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-04-07 15:37 EST -------
Sorry for taking so long to get back to this.

The package builds in mock on FC-5 and devel, and rpmlint is happy.  %check
throws several errors of the form:

DBI handle 0xa4c9e38 cleared whilst still active at test.pl line 39.
    dbih_clearcom (sth 0xa4c9e38, com 0xa59b458, imp DBD::AnyData::st):
       FLAGS 0x182115: COMSET Active Warn PrintError PrintWarn ShowErrorStatement
       PARENT DBI::db=HASH(0xa0c98d4)
       KIDS 0 (0 Active)
       IMP_DATA undef
       NUM_OF_FIELDS 3
       NUM_OF_PARAMS 0

which doesn't effect the build but might we worth looking into if they would
appear in actual use.

* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and
conforms to the Perl template.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  It's not included separately in the
package, but this is not necessary.
* source files match upstream:
   3434afdade1e2c9d79e85eca4bd8df17  DBD-AnyData-0.08.tar.gz
   3434afdade1e2c9d79e85eca4bd8df17  DBD-AnyData-0.08.tar.gz-save
   a23f31a0eb908ce5b5468bd2d4e44744  perl-DBD-AnyData.spec
* package builds in mock.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* package does not create any directories (besides %doc) and only uses
directories created by its dependencies.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.
* Package owns no files that are owned by other packages.


Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list