[Bug 187809] Review Request: perl-GSSAPI - Perl extension providing access to the GSSAPIv2 library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Apr 7 23:33:18 UTC 2006

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-GSSAPI - Perl extension providing access to the GSSAPIv2 library


------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-04-07 19:33 EST -------
Package builds fine in mock (devel branch) and rpmlint is silent.

BuildRequires: perl is not allowed.
Why %{perl_vendorarch}/GSSAPI* instead of just %{perl_vendorarch}/GSSAPI ?

* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and
conforms to the Perl template.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  It's not included separately in the
package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it.
* source files match upstream:
   91d5029a32302aa02414c9c8e3353cec  IO-Interface-0.98.tar.gz
   91d5029a32302aa02414c9c8e3353cec  IO-Interface-0.98.tar.gz-srpm
* package builds in mock.
X BuildRequires: perl not permitted.
* a shared library is present, but it is not in the library search path and
there is no need to run ldconfig.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directory it creates.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.
* does not own directories owned by other packages.

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list