[Bug 188400] Review Request: ssmtp
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Apr 11 11:53:21 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ssmtp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188400
------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-04-11 07:53 EST -------
* the ugly CPP flag check can be probably expressed simply as
| BuildRequires: krb5-devel # (perhaps implicated by openssl-devel in RHEL3)
| ...
| test -e /usr/include/krb5.h || CPPFLAGS='-I/usr/include/kerberos'
* the 'Provides: smtpdaemon' is right; afais, it is used by other
packages to express a requirement on a sendmail compatible CLI
tool. Interpreting it as something which listens on a TCP port does
not make sense because the daemon might be running on another host
which can not be controlled by the local package-manager
* sometimes ago, I packaged ssmtpd myself. In this package, the
%install section was shorter:
| %install
| rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
| %makeinstall etcdir='$(sysconfdir)' GEN_CONFIG=/bin/true mandir="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_mandir/man8"
| install -p -m644 ssmtp.conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_sysconfdir/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf
I does not include your alternatives symlinks but is nevertheless a
little bit shorter.
* not a blocker on Fedora, but using '/sbin/update-alternatives'
instead of '/sbin/alternatives' is more portable across the various
Linux distributions.
* I would not Provide: the man-pages; it is error-prone (see your
'man5/ssmtp.conf.5' entry) and you can not control how 'rpmbuild'
packages them finally (perhaps bz2-packed or plain instead of
gzip-packed)
* I think, a real name would help significantly in getting a sponsor...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list