Another Packaging/Review Guidlines clarification
chris.stone at gmail.com
Sat Apr 15 14:33:48 UTC 2006
I don't see anything wrong with it being a MUST. The description says
that it SHOULD, and if it doesn't then provide an explanation as to
why. Seems fair and simple enough.
On 4/15/06, Christoph Wickert <cw-spam at arcor.de> wrote:
> How about adding something like:
> > Must - A package should always use the latest stable upstream release.
> > If for any reason this isn't possible, this has to be explained in the
> > review / review request.
> to the Packaging/Review Guidelines? Not sure if this should be a MUST or
> a SHOULD.
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
More information about the fedora-extras-list