Contribution to Extras (an update)

[Michael Thomas]

Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 4/17/06, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs at math.uh.edu> wrote:
> 
>>The only context in which the requirement would be void would be that
>>of Fedora Extras, and then only if the steering committee declared
>>that the Games SIG can't place that additional restriction.  Which
>>they haven't.  So just what are you objecting to?
> 
> 
> Here's what I don't understand...  can I a package a game and review a
> game as a normal Extras contributor without having to follow the
> additional requirements of the games SIG?

Yes.  The SIG only enforces these additional guidelines on packages
reviewed by the SIG members.

--Mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3820 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060417/e5e2d027/attachment.bin>