[Bug 189342] Python egg spec template

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Python egg spec template


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189342


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |NEEDINFO
                 CC|                            |fedora-extras-
                   |                            |list at redhat.com




------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi  2006-04-19 12:46 EST -------
I have no experience with python eggs, so Cc'ing the FE list for comments about
the specfile contents and whether a separate template for them is actually needed.


Some questions/notes though, assuming this will be added:

fedora-newrpmspec should still continue to use the generic python template, no?

Using %{name} and %{name}-%{version} in %files sounds a bit optimistic for my
taste, it's not uncommon to slightly deviate from upstream naming in python
package names, and I don't see %{name} or %{version} being passed to any build
or install commands.  --> there's a disconnect

Also, the example %files entries use %{python_sitelib}, are the files always
installed there, or sometimes to %{python_sitearch}?

Due to the two potential issues above, I'd be inclined to just drop the example
%files entries.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.