The system doesn't always work

[Callum Lerwick]

On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 13:47 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> In the meantime, the Packaging Guidelines should be updated to clarify
> when use of fedora-usermngt is warranted.  I realize there's some
> controversy involved, so should FESCO get involved to officially
> bless/veto the use of fedora-usermngt?

Yes please. It seems absolutely insane to me to not have a set policy on
something as important as this. Either we use fedora-usermgmt in all
packages, or not at all. (Personally my vote's for merging the
fedora-usermgmt functionality into adduser itself, as Jef recommended
IIRC.)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060423/0a83c22b/attachment.sig>