Erlang package naming
Jason L Tibbitts III
tibbs at math.uh.edu
Mon Apr 24 15:38:50 UTC 2006
I think this is the first Erlang package in Extras:
Am I wrong to interpret the naming guidelines to say that this package
should be named erlang-esdl instead of just esdl? What about the
Provides: esdl bit?
Since this is the first Erlang package there aren't any guidelines to
follow, but "esdl" seems awfully generic to me and there's already
been at least one naming clash. (The poor Eiffel folks had to rename
their SDL module.) Unfortunately other distros have chosen (poorly,
IMHO) to just call it "esdl", so either way there's a conflict.
More information about the fedora-extras-list