RFC: FESCo Future
skvidal at linux.duke.edu
Mon Apr 24 15:42:58 UTC 2006
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 17:36 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 11:20 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > > > > * Are you FESCO's delegate/representative to FPB?
> > > >
> > > > nope
> > > Bad - Again, no democracy.
> > maybe I'm confused - where was the promise of democracy?
> > > ATM, I am just asking questions to clarify things. Unfortunately, I
> > > sense no indication of democracy.
> > Again - where did the assumption of democracy come from?
> Then, I don't see any use in continuing this discussion.
> Thorsten, why did you ask? It's apparent, the current system is not
> interested in democracy.
I didn't say there wasn't interest. Just that there was no promise that
it would, from the start, be democratic. As others have mentioned - it
never starts that way. Democracy evolves. Thorsten's suggestion is an
excellent evolutionary step toward electing members to fesco.
More information about the fedora-extras-list