ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at
Wed Apr 26 15:00:45 UTC 2006

On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 07:57:54PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 16:22 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:41:57PM +0200, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> > > So why have this discussion *now* and not when thl and ville were
> > > working on it ?
> > 
> > You might just as well ask why I didn't do any fedora extras between
> > spring 2003 and 2005. I think you as well as Thorsten and Ville had
> > been around at that time, so you will probably know, and for those
> > that don't I don't want to start ranting - there is nothing to gain,
> > it's better to keep on constructive optimism ;)
> I am interested in that rant then. It would help since we ( Project
> Board) are trying to figure out better the policies on Fedora Extras and
> Core as repositories and it helps to understand what has changed.

I don't feel that burring out old fedora history and blaming this and
that will help. It will probably only stir up some arguments again and
generate another dichotomy.

The current picture of fedora core/extras/legacy/etc. is a far more
healthier than it was, when I stepped away (at least from my personal
POV) and that's what really matters.

If you are still interested I'd take that off-list.
Axel.Thimm at
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list