RRDtool is in need of attention

[Kevin Fenzi]

>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Ricker <kaboom at oobleck.net> writes:

Chris> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Matthias Saou wrote:
>> Lately, I haven't been using rrdtool as intensively as I used to,
>> so my interest has gotten lower and the lack of "easy real world
>> testing" I used to do has kept me from updating the package in a
>> (way too) long while.
>> 
>> If anyone uses rrdtool actively and wants to take over
>> maintainership, I'd be more than welcome to pass it on!
>> 
>> Current open bugzilla entries : * Upgrade request rrdtool to 1.2
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167904 *
>> rrdtool 1.0.50 has been released
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184003 *
>> Please rebuild the package
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185909
>> 
>> What had kept me from updating to 1.2.x was the initial lack of PHP
>> module, which would have introduced a regression. From what I've
>> been told, there is now a working separate PHP module that could
>> easily be included in Extras at the same time RRDtool gets updated
>> to 1.2.x.

Chris> I use it a lot and don't mind maintaining it

Chris> Looks like cacti and munin are the two packages already in
Chris> Extras which use it. Do they both work with 1.2?

I think munin does. I haven't tested it, but from what I have read, it
should work with it fine. I can try and test it out at some point
here. If you can make a 1.2.x rrdtool test package that would be
helpfull. ;) 

Chris> later, chris

kevin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060412/31ab85b8/attachment.sig>