Removal of orphaned packages
Brian Pepple
bdpepple at ameritech.net
Thu Apr 13 23:39:08 UTC 2006
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 00:29 +0100, Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It was recently discussed on here that the importing of sodipodi may not
> be that good as inkscape is the successor.
>
> Would it be worthwhile removing any packages on the orphaned list where
> there is a successor?
>
Hasn't development for sodipodi pretty much stopped? I think that more
than anything, is the relevant issue.
/B
--
Brian Pepple <bdpepple at ameritech.net>
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060413/32468681/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list