Another Packaging/Review Guidlines clarification

[Christopher Stone]

I don't see anything wrong with it being a MUST.  The description says
that it SHOULD, and if it doesn't then provide an explanation as to
why.  Seems fair and simple enough.

On 4/15/06, Christoph Wickert <cw-spam at arcor.de> wrote:
> How about adding something like:
>
> > Must - A package should always use the latest stable upstream release.
> > If for any reason this isn't possible, this has to be explained in the
> > review / review request.
>
> to the Packaging/Review Guidelines? Not sure if this should be a MUST or
> a SHOULD.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> --
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
>